Learning Management Systems (LMSs) have become foundational infrastructure for organizations delivering digital education and training. They are good at what they were built for—hosting content, administering assessments, and tracking completions.
But as the world shifts toward skills-based hiring, micro-credentialing, and Learning and Employment Records (LERs), it has become increasingly clear that LMSs were never designed to produce the kind of rich, contextual talent data the future demands.
They can tell you what someone finished, but not what they actually learned, how deeply they learned it, or how that learning connects to real-world skills. Flat skill tags, keyword lists, and checkbox competencies simply can’t keep up.
This is why we’ve begun to explore a future-facing concept we call the Standardized Talent Asset Mapping Protocol (STAMP)—a possible evolution in how learning systems might generate richer talent signals for the emerging LER ecosystem.
STAMP is not a product. It is a vision, a design hypothesis, and an early-stage idea that we believe could address some of the structural limitations of traditional skills tagging.
Skills tagging today is mostly keyword-based. A course is tagged with “leadership,” “communication,” or “Python” and that tag is assumed to communicate meaning across systems.
But this approach has several foundational problems:
A word like “analysis” could mean data analytics, literary analysis, or root-cause analysis in an operations role.
Different organizations use different terms for the same skill—or the same term for entirely different skills.
A tag created inside one LMS has no inherent relationship to tags used by employers, credential issuers, or the broader LER ecosystem.
Human learning isn’t flat. It is layered, sequenced, and interconnected—but tagging systems treat it like a grocery list.
As the LER ecosystem matures and Universal Talent Passports begin to emerge as a new class of user-facing apps, the limitations of keyword tagging become even clearer.
We need richer data—not more tags.
STAMP is a conceptual protocol we are exploring for creating more structured, meaningful, and interoperable talent data.
Instead of tagging skills as isolated keywords, STAMP would aim to:
The idea behind STAMP rests on two core innovations:
Organizations will always speak in their own dialects. A nursing program, an automotive training center, and a coding bootcamp each use terminology unique to their field.
Ontological Refraction is the conceptual mechanism STAMP introduces to translate local terminology into shared meaning—without forcing standardization of expression.
It’s not about replacing an organization’s vocabulary.
It’s about making that vocabulary translatable.
By mapping internal concepts to reference points in public taxonomies (like O*NET, ESCO, or CTDL), learning data becomes semantically interoperable without losing nuance.
Learning isn’t a list—it’s a sequence.
STAMP imagines a protocol where course content is analyzed to capture:
This would generate a structured “concept map” of learning experiences, enabling LMSs to articulate what was taught and how it builds into larger competencies.
Here’s how an LMS could function if powered by STAMP-style data:
Instead of simply tracking completion, LMSs could show:
This would dramatically improve personalization and instructional design.
With a better understanding of what a learner has actually learned, an LMS could recommend:
This would turn an LMS into a dynamic learning companion, not just a delivery platform.
STAMP-style data could be exported into a Universal Talent Passport, helping individuals:
This is especially important in a world where LERs depend on structured, interpretable data.
STAMP would create structured, machine-readable data models ideal for:
By structuring the data, STAMP would make LMS ecosystems more compatible with emerging technologies—not less.
As of September 2023, the LER ecosystem is expanding, but most LMS platforms still produce data that doesn’t translate well into interoperable talent signals.
STAMP represents one possible future direction—a bridge between:
Our goal is not to replace existing systems, but to explore how they might evolve into something more powerful and human-centered.
STAMP is an idea still under exploration, but the need it addresses is clear:
The future of talent mobility requires data with meaning, context, structure, and interoperability.
As we continue to imagine and prototype the future of Universal Talent Passports and learner-owned records, protocols like STAMP point toward what could be possible:
The work is early, the vision is ambitious, and the next steps are still unfolding.
But if we want the LER ecosystem to truly serve individuals, we must evolve the systems that generate talent data in the first place.
STAMP is one possible way forward—and the exploration has only just begun.